Votable Supply Adjustment - Auto-Abstaining Wallet
Cast your vote
- 0xc0c3...475d For514.7K SCR
- 420.52K SCR
https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-votable-supply-adjustment/628/62
- 0xdonpepe.eth For268.46K SCR
- olimpio.eth For197.48K SCR
- the-monsters.eth For99.23K SCR
- 84.97K SCR
The Event Horizon Community voted For on this proposal (ehSCR-8): EventHorizon.vote/vote/scroll/ehSCR-8
- compound-dao.eth For70K SCR
- 69.56K SCR
- 0xea17...6676 For59.86K SCR
- 58.16K SCR
- 50.47K SCR
Voting rationale: https://forum.scroll.io/t/ethereum-tgu-delegate-thread/292/9?u=ethereumtgu
- 46.36K SCR
https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-votable-supply-adjustment/628/54?u=ethargentina
- pgov.eth For41.74K SCR
- 39.79K SCR
You can find our rationale in our delegate statement thread: https://forum.scroll.io/t/proxy-prev-boardroom-delegate-thread/561/5
- 34.56K SCR
Find our reasoning on our delegate thread https://forum.scroll.io/t/web3-citizen-delegate-thread/167/6?u=web3citizen
- jensei.eth For32.54K SCR
https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-votable-supply-adjustment/628/64?u=jensei
- seiryuu.eth For27.21K SCR
- connorm.eth For25.04K SCR
https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/rationale/re5YYNEbImK1ruBc3kzsw
- socket.eth For24.16K SCR
Makes sense, we do need to come up with innovative solution so governance keeps moving.
- surybonfil.eth For23.49K SCR
- slobo.eth For22.77K SCR
- gov.blockful.eth For22.37K SCR
https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-votable-supply-adjustment/628/56?u=blockful
- tonyolendo.eth For22.3K SCR
- 21.05K SCR
- pagodasia.eth For20.52K SCR
- aretagov.eth For19.99K SCR
- blid.eth For19.21K SCR
- 17.8K SCR
We’re supportive of this proposal, as we mentioned on the forum. While it may not fully capture the current delegate sentiment, the Auto-Abstaining Wallet offers a thoughtful and pragmatic approach to an ongoing governance challenge in Scroll, where proposals sometimes struggle to reach quorum due to the concentration of significant voting power held by a few delegates who may be temporarily inactive. By delegating 500K SCR to a wallet that auto-abstains, this mechanism effectively lowers the active votable supply, enabling the DAO to continue functioning smoothly. We believe this short-term solution supports governance continuity and stability. During this duration, it allows the DAO to assess its effectiveness with quorum issues and develop more comprehensive solutions, which are essential for the healthy evolution of the Scroll ecosystem.
- zkcampus.eth For16.73K SCR
- mexi.wtf For13.62K SCR
https://play.negationgame.com/s/scroll/rationale/SVisEIWzTEC6gtY_bBzxE
- 0xb62e...e495 Against13.16K SCR
I personally would have preferred a delegation boost to even out the power assymetry between the major delegates - which is most of the times random
- sparenberg.eth For12.98K SCR
- cypherbadger.eth For11.09K SCR
- 10.5K SCR
- 0x8b58...69b7 For8.5K SCR
https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-votable-supply-adjustment/628/55
- 8.47K SCR
- 0x76e4...a876 For7.4K SCR
https://forum.scroll.io/t/lifeofdan-el-delegate-thread/186/7
- 0x0d32...9179 For7.17K SCR
- ethkipu.eth For6.82K SCR
- benedictvs.eth For6.31K SCR
- aranadigital.eth For4.85K SCR
- axianetwork.eth For4.8K SCR
- 4.7K SCR
- tanegov.eth For4K SCR
- donofdaos.eth For3.54K SCR
- ignasdefi.eth For2.68K SCR
- rgalet.eth For2.62K SCR
- 0xf5ca...15ff For2.02K SCR
Voting power should be given based on actual retrospective contribution in order to promote active contributors and increase future contributors.
- 1.64K SCR
- 0xbb59...f25e For1K SCR
- 0xe1b82…f4e1a Against687.29 SCR
- 613.51 SCR
Good mitigation strategy, I support it
- 0xcc8e2…fded6 Against500.16 SCR
- 0x6e931…6b354 Against458.37 SCR
- 0xc2405…9c677 Against440.62 SCR
- lexx77.eth For395.65 SCR
- unicircle.eth Against354.68 SCR
We would have liked to see this used as an opportunity to incentive new delegates joining the ecosystem thus we are voting AGAINST this proposal delegation
- 0x4b6d1…95ea2 Against333.3 SCR
- 0xe40cc…b9ef1 Against257.38 SCR
- croozercold.eth For252.85 SCR
- 0xe78bc…0ad44 Against248.15 SCR
- 0xa0b06…b1822 Against231.19 SCR
- 0xa6927…8514f Against217.71 SCR
- 0xf4584…a5e3e Against216.9 SCR
- 0x42b2c…e10d0 Against214.24 SCR
- 0x7d397…1a838 Against210.79 SCR
- 0x92f04…19884 Against208.86 SCR
- 0xd4962…c88d7 Against202.74 SCR
- tekrox.eth For197.55 SCR
- 0x49640…21ab4 Against196.68 SCR
- 0x2f4e7…adcec Against194.1 SCR
- 0x1e521…ec597 Against193.76 SCR
- 0xbf189…c730c Against189.72 SCR
- 0x849d3…04148 Against185.5 SCR
- 0x4b818…2aa27 Against185.04 SCR
- 0x65260…48152 Against182.29 SCR
- 0xe6840…bf25f Against180.77 SCR
- 0xfcd21…6739a Against180.41 SCR
- 0xeb018…2fbc6 Against178.65 SCR
- 0x46773…c0efe Against177.24 SCR
- 0x5d00b…432f9 Against177.06 SCR
- defimova.eth Abstain176.92 SCR
- 0x87eb4…5c491 Against175.34 SCR
- 0xb02b6…2f6a0 Against171.69 SCR
- 0x10992…7b457 Against171.23 SCR
- 0x2f853…452f8 Against167.3 SCR
- 0x0ccaf…85654 Against166.49 SCR
- 0x593f1…2e5c7 Against165.98 SCR
- 0x541c5…6ebce Against165.88 SCR
- 0x410af…52741 Against164.53 SCR
- 0x7bfa7…dce0b Against164.44 SCR
- 0x0e603…8b052 Against163.86 SCR
- 0x14c0b…b1796 Against163.43 SCR
- 0x2b63b…8f154 Against162.97 SCR
- 0x86983…18d8c Against161.64 SCR
- 0xee0a2…59629 Against160.91 SCR
- 0x7ef0e…916aa Against157.88 SCR
- 0x0a5a6…50f8e Against156.5 SCR
- ezr3al.eth Against155.25 SCR
I would rather see this VP being distributed evenly across all delegates according to their current power in % and then remove it over time again if VP in total increases over time.
- 0xa6984…06a2d Against152.92 SCR
- 0x644bc…cf4a3 Against152.16 SCR
- 0x48c23…c563d Against149.52 SCR
- 0x0424e…9cbcb Against148.56 SCR
- 0x952c7…43345 Against146.02 SCR
- 0x331f8…b1a88 Against144.86 SCR
- 0x08c3b…36027 Against144.39 SCR
- 0x7becf…34411 Against144.1 SCR
- 0xf3f3b…9d252 Against138.8 SCR
- 0x0057b…915c8 For137.47 SCR
- 0x01695…0eb01 For120 SCR
- 0x27482…6ac26 For113.35 SCR
- 0x09b17…9cb4b For110.86 SCR
- 0xcbd5e…a8edc For104.99 SCR
- 0x4c29d…91a57 For100 SCR
- 0xac236…28f59 For98.03 SCR
- 0x413a9…e1af3 For87.78 SCR
- 0x0c338…e6b25 For80 SCR
- 0x9fc40…cf78b For80 SCR
- 0x7cecb…70dc1 For77.47 SCR
- 0x5186...51c0 For73.06 SCR
- kosmikshape.eth For69.9 SCR
- 0x1fc8b…a933d For68.36 SCR
- 0x6cd4...8fcd Against65.86 SCR
- 0x2d5b2…ea430 For51 SCR
- 0x09a6...6bd9 For47.94 SCR
- 0x7ea74…5b267 For45.15 SCR
- 0x1a925…82d56 For44.87 SCR
- 0x73bca…3de09 For42.86 SCR
- 0x45e92…b448a For42.58 SCR
- 0xebdd8…668a9 For41.09 SCR
- 0xb62ff…92b83 For40.86 SCR
- 0x11a1a…43771 For39.87 SCR
- 0x72cac…986fd For39.19 SCR
- 0x926e7…080a2 For39.17 SCR
- 0xe73a...d125 For38.96 SCR
Consent would work better as it doesn’t require a Quorum. However, this is a practical way to reach the same conclusion. I support having a path to make things happen with the people actively participating while not requiring everyone to vote.
- 0x0100e…67cc9 For34.9 SCR
- 0x2ce23…ac905 For30.45 SCR
- 0x3f4b2…aeb93 For23.09 SCR
- 0x607c7…e2764 For13.67 SCR
Im for this
- 春江花月夜.eth For12.35 SCR
- 0xee49f…03a44 For10.72 SCR
- 10 SCR
As I understand it, there is technically no cost to run the program for the DAO, as no DAO funds will be needed to pay personnel or for tools, so I see no reason not to do it.
- 0x3a88...8da0 For10 SCR
- 0x2bcd...b5c3 Abstain8.19 SCR
- xiaogege.eth For6.27 SCR
- 0x0579...4048 For6.01 SCR
This provides a practical, low-risk solution to quorum challenges, ensuring governance continuity even during delegate absences without changing thresholds or compromising decision-making integrity.
- 0x901d...fe7d For5 SCR
Rationale: https://forum.scroll.io/t/matt-exunico-delegate-thread/781/5?u=matt_factorylabs
- 0x26885…92fea For4.34 SCR
- je.simpleid.eth For1.05 SCR
- hexblades.eth For1.01 SCR
- tweenky.eth For1 SCR
- 0xc554...7759 For0.08 SCR
This provides a practical, low-risk solution to quorum challenges, ensuring governance continuity even during delegate absences without changing thresholds or compromising decision-making integrity.
- 0xcb156…aa1a0 For0 SCR
- 0x82e7b…cbeaa For0 SCR
- 0x2d0af…d4350 For0 SCR
- 0x6b42f…4e208 For0 SCR
Proposal Title: Votable Supply Adjustment - Auto-Abstaining Wallet
Proposal Type: Governance
TLDR
This proposal suggests creating a new wallet that would receive 500,000 SCR from the DAO treasury and would auto-abstain on all votes. The delegation, managed via a Foundation multisig, would run until October 2025. The goal is to ensure proposals can pass even if top delegates are unavailable.
The relevant discussion took place in this post.
Summary
Especially after the most recent voting cycle and seeing the fluctuations in the votable supply, there is a clear need to ensure that we are able to have proposals hit quorum.
This proposal is meant to provide a temporary solution for a voting supply related adjustment to make sure that governance votes don't fail purely due to not hitting quorum. Following the discussions over the last month, we are proposing to create a new wallet that wil receive 500,000 SCR from the DAO and will auto-abstain for each onchain proposal through the October voting cycle.
While the initial proposed centered around a votable supply adjustment and distribution of voting power from the DAO treasury, it is likely that proposal would not pass. As a result, we have adjusted this proposal to center around the auto-abstaining wallet idea.
Motivation
We need to raise the active votable supply.
- Votable supply = the proporation of the total supply that is currently able to vote (delegated)
- Active votable supply = the portion of the votable supply that votes a majority of the time and is active in at least one other way (calls or forum)
As the April voting cycle, the following data give a sense of the distribution of active voting power:
- Total voting power (vp) amongst those who have voted at least on 1/3 proposals (68 delegates): 2,676,700
- Total vp amongst those who have voted on at least 2/3 proposals (56 delegates): 2,419,471
- Total vp amongst those who have voted on 3/3 proposals (38 delegates): 2,165,731
- Quorum: 2,100,000
- The top two delegates have a voting power of 887,149 between the two of them.
We are in a position where if a few delegates, especially the top ones, end up having to miss a vote for any unforeseen circumstances, votes are likely to not hit quorum. This can act as an unnecessary bottleneck for the DAO and may result in increased apathy if not addressed.
With this in mind, we are proposing to create a wallet that will auto-abstain it's delegation of 500,000, effectively lowering the quorum to 1.6m SCR without lowering the threashold itself.
There are no clear conflicts of interest for this proposal as we see it.
Execution
Operational
The operational process will be as follows:
- If approved, the governance team will set up a new multisig that will receive the 500k SCR
- The gov team will use that wallet to auto-abstain by the end of each voting cycle
There are no new tools introduced here. We will provide all updates in this post.
Personnel & Resources
The Foundation governance team will set up the multisig and vote on a monthly basis. Eugene and Jamilya will own the project, with support from others as needed.
Anyone in the community will be welcome to provide feedback and hold the program accountable on the forum.
Financial
The overall budget for this proposal is 500,000 SCR to be used for delegation to a single multisig controlled by the Foundation. The funds would be sent back to the treasury by the end of October.
There is technically is no cost to run the program for the DAO, as no DAO funds will be needed to pay personnel or for tools. The Foundation will cover nominal costs that arise (e.g. setup of a new multisig, etc.).
Evaluation
The primary metric for this proposal will center around whether or not proposals are hitting quorum. Specifically, the percent of proposals that are clearing quorum while this wallet is being used. Additionally, we will track by how much quorum is being cleared (or the amount by which a proposal fails).
Conclusion
This proposal outlines a temporary delegation of 500k SCR to a new wallet managed by the Foundation that would auto-abstain on all votes.
Proposed Actions
This proposal does not execute any transactions onchain.
Voting over time
156 votes over the voting period
Proposal ID 5409234667… · data from on-chain Governor + SCR token (Scroll mainnet RPC) — durable source of truth