Reason: https://forum.scroll.io/t/curia-delegate-thread/616/6

Reason: We support this proposal to execute a test of the Scroll DAO 3-day timelock mechanism, which will confirm that the process functions correctly from start to finish in a secure and transparent manner.

Reason: Due to our role as a service provider for GCR, we are abstaining from this vote to avoid a conflict of interest.

Reason: We are in favor of the Governance Council (GC) proposal, as it represents a strategic step toward advancing the Scroll DAO’s governance framework with a clear focus on innovation. The GC is designed to oversee and drive research, experimentation, and the development of governance tools, helping ensure that Scroll remains at the forefront of decentralized governance.

Reason: We support the formation of the Community Council as a focused effort to improve oversight of the Local Node program and strengthen community engagement. Starting with a phased approach allows the Council to scale as needed, while the lightweight grants pilot fills a clear gap in supporting grassroots initiatives that fall outside the scope of Local Nodes. Importantly, its mandate is distinct from the EGC, while the EGC focuses on protocol-level growth, the Community Council supports localized, people-driven efforts that require ongoing evaluation, cultural context, and direct engagement. This separation of responsibilities is clear.

Reason: We vote Abstain on this proposal at this time. We have carefully reviewed the Carroll Mechanism concept and recognize its potential to significantly improve DAO decision-making, possibly becoming the next major evolution in governance. However, this approach introduces additional complexity, raising concerns about practical adoption within the community and the need for clearer risk mitigation strategies. Specifically, if milestone 1, the literature review on the mechanism, does not yield positive results, Scroll risks spending $45K without tangible benefit. While we support continued research and want to see innovation turn into a ready-to-use product, we believe a thorough risk mitigation strategy is necessary to address uncertainties related to the research outcomes and potential financial impact before fully committing to this proposal.

Reason: We strongly support the Security Subsidy Program as a crucial initiative to bolster the growth and resilience of the Scroll ecosystem. By offering financial support for security audits, this program helps builders overcome the often prohibitive costs associated with thorough security reviews. This enables developers to prioritize secure and reliable project development, which in turn enhances overall network trust and encourages broader adoption. We believe this subsidy will play an important role in fostering a safer, more robust environment for innovation within the Scroll community.

Reason: We support the Feynman Upgrade. It introduces a more resilient fee model, enhances EVM compatibility, and simplifies the smart contract structure, all backed by thorough audits. This is a meaningful step forward for the Scroll protocol, and we’re excited to see it implemented.

Reason: We support this proposal as it contains a thoroughly developed plan to target specific types of projects to incubate onchain infrastructure in Africa. We like the fact that the proposal aims to build 5–10 MVPs within three months, bridging Web3 and traditional finance through a clear development pipeline with measurable KPIs. We look forward to seeing this Kenya initiative drive meaningful progress in a key region the foundation has set for local node deployment.

Reason: We’re voting in support of this proposal because it introduces a creative and localized approach to growing the Scroll ecosystem in Mexico. By using a mobile node to directly engage founders, the initiative brings mentorship, education, and grant preparation to communities with strong potential to join the open economy. However, we believe it would be better to have a more concise execution plan finalized before the 3 months period begins. (e.g. detailed curriculum etc.) This would allow for more effective ongoing adjustments during the execution phase, considering 2 months period seems too short to make impactful adjustments and optimize the program's impact.

Reason: We’re supportive of this proposal, as we mentioned on the forum. While it may not fully capture the current delegate sentiment, the Auto-Abstaining Wallet offers a thoughtful and pragmatic approach to an ongoing governance challenge in Scroll, where proposals sometimes struggle to reach quorum due to the concentration of significant voting power held by a few delegates who may be temporarily inactive. By delegating 500K SCR to a wallet that auto-abstains, this mechanism effectively lowers the active votable supply, enabling the DAO to continue functioning smoothly. We believe this short-term solution supports governance continuity and stability. During this duration, it allows the DAO to assess its effectiveness with quorum issues and develop more comprehensive solutions, which are essential for the healthy evolution of the Scroll ecosystem.

Reason: We’re supporting this proposal because it introduces the Ecosystem Growth Council to guide Scroll’s ecosystem expansion at a time when coordinated growth is essential. We believe the Ecosystem Growth Council (EGC) has clear KPIs and will establish a strong foundation for driving meaningful and measurable impact. By bringing clarity to how initiatives are proposed, evaluated, and resourced, the Council strengthens the ability to fund what matters most, high-impact projects that deliver tangible value to the ecosystem. This proposal represents a strong first step toward more strategic and effective governance and we believe it will meaningfully enhance Scroll’s capacity to support ecosystem builders.

Reason: We’re supportive of this proposal because recognizing and rewarding governance contributions is a critical step toward sustaining long-term engagement across the ecosystem. As we continue to evolve our governance structures, it's important that delegates feel seen and valued for their efforts. The creation of a working group dedicated to refining the next iteration of GCR is not only timely but also essential to ensuring the metric is both fair and reflective of the actual impact individuals and teams have on Scroll governance. We believe that a thoughtful, collaborative approach to defining these metrics will lead to a more robust and inclusive governance framework.

Reason: We support this proposal because Brazil already has high crypto adoption, with strong transaction volume and a growing user base. This presents a valuable opportunity to attract builders to Scroll. We support the modular crypto approach and trust the team’s proven track record and well-structured execution plan. The initiative combines online classes through “Programa de Aceleração Scroll Brasil”, in-person events across three cities, and robust educational content, all backed by clear KPIs. We’re excited to support the formation of the Brazil Local Node and look forward to its impact on the Scroll ecosystem.

Reason: We’re supporting this proposal because it’s delivering a clear seven-week curriculum, featuring hands-on exercises and providing dedicated mentorship that’s directly addressing the current shortfall in active governance participation. By guiding new delegates through a structured, repeatable onboarding pathway, ensuring they acquire the skills necessary to engage meaningfully in on-chain decision-making ,driving valuable participation in governance.

Reason: We support this proposal because it establishes a robust yet adaptable governance framework for Scroll DAO. The Constitution structure serves as both an operational blueprint and a social agreement, providing a practical foundation for community governance given the current separation from direct control over the Foundation and smart contracts. Its thoughtful proposal and voting processes set the stage for progressive decentralization and community-led growth, ensuring that the framework can evolve alongside the ecosystem.

Reason: We support this proposal because it would delivers insights to help Scroll design and fund builder support programs effectively, ensuring limited resources aren’t wasted. The budget is reasonable, the team is qualified, and a collaborative effort across Labs, Foundation, and delegates will foster strategic and impactful growth for the Scroll ecosystem.