Reason: My reasoning is found here: https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-galileo-upgrade/1315/12?u=humbertobesso

Reason: I choose Avantgarde due to the following reasons: 1. After checking the Negation Game, I found out that the fee is 5% cheaper, which is a significant number 2. They contacted me directly, which talks about their extra-mile effort for reaching results, I expect that if they reached a low rank delegate to solve any questions or clarify info they will do the most detailed thing to deliver the results they commit to. 3. Made an AI in-depth assessment of the three providers and the result was: the Avantgarde proposal is recommended as the best-balanced choice. It would provide Scroll DAO with a professional, one-stop treasury management solution that achieves sustainable yield (via options and DeFi yields) forum.scroll.io forum.scroll.io , maintains decentralized custody and oversight forum.scroll.io forum.scroll.io , and institutes comprehensive risk controls appropriate for a DAO treasury forum.scroll.io forum.scroll.io . Furthermore, Avantgarde’s emphasis on growing the Scroll ecosystem – by deploying new on-chain financial infrastructure – aligns with the DAO’s long-term interests beyond just financial returns forum.scroll.io forum.scroll.io . Their plan is ambitious but grounded in expertise and past experience with similar treasuries, increasing confidence in execution. By selecting Avantgarde, Scroll DAO would be entrusting its treasury to a team that not only safeguards and grows the assets, but also acts as a strategic partner in building out Scroll’s decentralized future. This combination of prudent financial management and ecosystem alignment makes Avantgarde the optimal choice to steward Scroll’s treasury at this pivotal stage. With those 3 reasons, my vote goes to Avantgarde.

Reason: I vote FOR because am open to experimentation, however I provide several observations. I was not included in this batch although I am active in gov calls, workshops, local initiatives, and proposal voting, but do not hold the VP required. This could be seen as a way to incentivize delegates as me to accrue more VP. Said that, my observations are the following: The problem of representative democracy is representation (delegates9. DAOs and AI could be leading the way towards a participatory democracy which allows plurality. Incentivizing participation is key, but we must make sure that we are not concentrating even more power to those that can easily gather to decide the faith of our DAO. In a representative system, we must incentivize that more delegates enter the game so that we get more richness of perspectives, experiences, knowledge, contacts, and resources that move us forward to our mission and vision. We must be careful to not fall into the same mistakes that other collectives have gone through, that's why a Governance Council that has academic and empirical experience is a must. Let's continue with this and use this experience as a baseline for experimenting other approaches while improving this one too (the design).

Reason: A safe way to test a tool to advance into decentralization and automation.

Reason: A governance council is a must need for any DAO. We need dedicated people to think, analyze, propose and guide the DAO efforts towards decentralization and automation so that we may gain speed and accuracy in achieving our Massive Transformative Purpose.

Reason: It seems the DAO (we voters) need more time to reflect on this proposal. The timing felt rushed for us Delegates to discuss and enrich the proposal for finding a way forward.

Reason: Adopting Feynman strengthens protocol security, aligns closer to Ethereum standards, and reduces technical debt without any cost outlay, all under robust audit and governance processes.

Reason: Ensuring Scroll projects have security checks will make the difference when talking about our ecosystem. Subsidies are a must for builders and to lower the risks for Scroll users.

Reason: I've provided feedback to this project and used Negation game to reflect on the proposal. I believe the CC will bring great value to the DAO and to the Local Nodes around the globel. Here my reflection on the CC: https://forum.scroll.io/t/proposal-community-council-formation/935/5?u=humbertobesso

Reason: As legislators do - draft proposals and vote for them. I vote for making this proposal happen.

Reason: Consent would work better as it doesn’t require a Quorum. However, this is a practical way to reach the same conclusion. I support having a path to make things happen with the people actively participating while not requiring everyone to vote.

Reason: Great initiative to support the unpaid effort that Delegates and active DAO members have put to build and protect our shared values.

Reason: Having a dedicated Council dedicated to Growth with a defined budget will surely help Scroll. Looking forward to seeing the profiles of those wanting to run this initiative.

Reason: The Kenyan local node initiators have put good energy into drafting a compelling proposal. I trust they will do an amazing job connecting their local community to the opportunities that the Scroll ecosystem has. The Mexican local node is willing to compete and collaborate with other nodes so that we improve constantly our ecosystem.

Reason: The Brazilian delegates and active DAO members have gathered and showed that they have the capacity and willingness to grow the Scroll ecosystem. The Mexican local node is willing to compete and collaborate with other nodes so that we improve constantly our ecosystem.

Reason: I really like the proposal, I just think it's a big bet for the DAO to take alone. I'd prefer that instead of this proposal another one dedicated to PR is voted, so that this proposal gets funded by at least other 2 DAOs. It is not as urgent as it could be thought. I vote Abstain because I see that votes in polls (TG and Forum) are in favor of, including the Foundation, the proposal has gotten enough time and conversations going, and I am not hard against the proposal.

Reason: The proposal clearly outlines the benefits and impact on users. Ethereum compatibility and staying updated to improved UX is key.

Reason: The proposed Constitution integrates the concerns and insights of the community. It was drafted with awareness from the members of the DAO. Looking forward to testing it out and improving or enriching it next year.

Reason: My reasoning is found here: https://forum.scroll.io/t/humbertobesso-delegate-thread/372/4?u=humbertobesso